Home/Case Law/BOB ARUCAN vs. CITY OF STOCKTON, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By BRAGG and ASSOCIATES
Regular Decision

BOB ARUCAN vs. CITY OF STOCKTON, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By BRAGG and ASSOCIATES

Filed: Sep 15, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ964975 [STK 0191335] ADJ2722796 [STK 0191750]

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration and Removal are dismissed. The June 30, 2008 decision that the record requires further development is not a final order subject to reconsideration.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration and Removal are dismissed. The June 30, 2008 decision that the record requires further development is not a final order subject to reconsideration.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

BOB ARUCAN vs. CITY OF STOCKTON, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By BRAGG and ASSOCIATES (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox