Home/Case Law/Beverly DeRosa vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Beverly DeRosa vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Jul 20, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ3587014 (MON 0284627)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves an employer appealing a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision imposing sanctions and attorney's fees. The sanctions arose from the employer's claims examiner's willful failure to timely provide applicant's earnings information as ordered. The WCAB denied reconsideration, upholding the sanctions and the amended attorney's fee award of nearly $3,700, finding the examiner's testimony regarding compliance lacked credibility. The employer's petition was deemed timely filed as it addressed the amended order which substantially increased the attorney's fee.

Beverly DeRosa vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves an employer appealing a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision imposing sanctions and attorney's fees. The sanctions arose from the employer's claims examiner's willful failure to timely provide applicant's earnings information as ordered. The WCAB denied reconsideration, upholding the sanctions and the amended attorney's fee award of nearly $3,700, finding the examiner's testimony regarding compliance lacked credibility. The employer's petition was deemed timely filed as it addressed the amended order which substantially increased the attorney's fee.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Beverly DeRosa vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Beverly DeRosa vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Beverly DeRosa vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

Beverly DeRosa vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES-IHSS, legally uninsured and adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.