Home/Case Law/BERNARDO SALAZAR MOLINA vs. LANDRYS/McCORMICK & SCHMICK'S; INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Regular Decision

BERNARDO SALAZAR MOLINA vs. LANDRYS/McCORMICK & SCHMICK'S; INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

Filed: Feb 23, 2016
Los Angeles
ADJ8865310

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. This denial was based on the WCJ's credibility determination, which was given great weight as the WCJ observed the witness. The Board found no substantial evidence to reject the WCJ's findings and adopted the WCJ's report as their own reasoning. Consequently, the petition for reconsideration was formally denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. This denial was based on the WCJ's credibility determination, which was given great weight as the WCJ observed the witness. The Board found no substantial evidence to reject the WCJ's findings and adopted the WCJ's report as their own reasoning. Consequently, the petition for reconsideration was formally denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

BERNARDO SALAZAR MOLINA vs. LANDRYS/McCORMICK & SCHMICK'S; INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA (2016) – Los Angeles | CompFox