CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a Petition for Reconsideration in the case of Benito Alvarado v. Gross Egg Ranch and State Compensation Insurance Fund. The WCAB found the petition to be untimely and also subject to denial for failing to fairly state material evidence as required by WCAB Rule 10842(a). Specifically, the lien claimant's assertion that the case was never on calendar was contradicted by the electronic record. Therefore, the petition was dismissed.
BENITO ALVARADO vs. GROSS EGG RANCH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Riverside. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Riverside.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a Petition for Reconsideration in the case of Benito Alvarado v. Gross Egg Ranch and State Compensation Insurance Fund. The WCAB found the petition to be untimely and also subject to denial for failing to fairly state material evidence as required by WCAB Rule 10842(a). Specifically, the lien claimant's assertion that the case was never on calendar was contradicted by the electronic record. Therefore, the petition was dismissed.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.