Home/Case Law/BENILDA VELASCO vs. FLOURISHING MEADOWS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

BENILDA VELASCO vs. FLOURISHING MEADOWS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Oct 16, 2017
Van Nuys
ADJ9499312

CompFox AI Summary

In this Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, the defendant sought reconsideration of an order allowing lien claims for medical records and copying services. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision regarding Citywide Scanning Service, finding their copying expenses were recoverable medical-legal costs and the defendant waived objections by failing to respond timely. However, the Board disallowed Vital Imaging Medical Group's lien, determining they failed to meet their burden of proving industrial causation for the applicant's injury. This amended decision means Citywide's lien is allowed, while Vital Imaging's is denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In this Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case, the defendant sought reconsideration of an order allowing lien claims for medical records and copying services. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision regarding Citywide Scanning Service, finding their copying expenses were recoverable medical-legal costs and the defendant waived objections by failing to respond timely. However, the Board disallowed Vital Imaging Medical Group's lien, determining they failed to meet their burden of proving industrial causation for the applicant's injury. This amended decision means Citywide's lien is allowed, while Vital Imaging's is denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

BENILDA VELASCO vs. FLOURISHING MEADOWS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2017) – Van Nuys | CompFox