Home/Case Law/BELINDA GORDON vs. THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO, DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE
Regular DecisionRemoval

BELINDA GORDON vs. THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO, DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE

Filed: Apr 18, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ2303207

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, finding it an extraordinary remedy not justified by the circumstances. The defendant sought to overturn an order taking the case off calendar due to the applicant's failure to obtain a physician's report. The Board ruled that the defendant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm required for removal. The case remains active and will proceed, with further hearings to be scheduled after the upcoming expedited hearing.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for removal, finding it an extraordinary remedy not justified by the circumstances. The defendant sought to overturn an order taking the case off calendar due to the applicant's failure to obtain a physician's report. The Board ruled that the defendant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm required for removal. The case remains active and will proceed, with further hearings to be scheduled after the upcoming expedited hearing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

BELINDA GORDON vs. THE ARC OF SAN DIEGO, DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox