CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a lien claimant's petition to reconsider a WCJ's order compelling both parties to cross-examine an Agreed Bill Reviewer (ABR) and share costs. The lien claimant argued this was futile as the ABR had already determined her services were allowable in full based on a prior WCJ order. The Appeals Board found merit in this argument, rescinded the WCJ's order, and returned the matter to the trial level for a conference to determine the ultimate resolution pathway.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a lien claimant's petition to reconsider a WCJ's order compelling both parties to cross-examine an Agreed Bill Reviewer (ABR) and share costs. The lien claimant argued this was futile as the ABR had already determined her services were allowable in full based on a prior WCJ order. The Appeals Board found merit in this argument, rescinded the WCJ's order, and returned the matter to the trial level for a conference to determine the ultimate resolution pathway.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.