CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns whether the applicant is entitled to a new Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) for a later reported injury. The defendant argued that under Navarro v. City of Montebello, the same QME should evaluate all injuries reported prior to an initial evaluation. However, the Board found Navarro distinguishable because the applicant's fifth injury was reported after the initial QME evaluation, despite occurring earlier. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to a new PQME for the later reported injury, and the defendant's petition for reconsideration was denied.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns whether the applicant is entitled to a new Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) for a later reported injury. The defendant argued that under Navarro v. City of Montebello, the same QME should evaluate all injuries reported prior to an initial evaluation. However, the Board found Navarro distinguishable because the applicant's fifth injury was reported after the initial QME evaluation, despite occurring earlier. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to a new PQME for the later reported injury, and the defendant's petition for reconsideration was denied.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.