CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a petition for reconsideration because it was not filed within the statutory timeframe and challenged non-final interlocutory orders. The Board treated the petition as one for removal, which was also dismissed as untimely. Despite finding defective service of prior orders, the petition for removal was still considered late based on the petitioner's own acknowledgment of service.
BAUDILIO LOPEZ CANSINOS vs. A PHO 21, INC., JOHN CHO, ANGIE CHO, SAMUEL CHO is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a petition for reconsideration because it was not filed within the statutory timeframe and challenged non-final interlocutory orders. The Board treated the petition as one for removal, which was also dismissed as untimely. Despite finding defective service of prior orders, the petition for removal was still considered late based on the petitioner's own acknowledgment of service.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.