Home/Case Law/BARNARD VILLAR vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CDCR, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

BARNARD VILLAR vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CDCR, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Feb 16, 2017
Van Nuys
ADJ10335205

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board found the medical opinion of the panel Qualified Medical Examiner (PQME) to be substantial medical evidence, based on an adequate examination and supported by reasoning. This opinion was relied upon by the workers' compensation administrative law judge. Consequently, the applicant's petition was denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board found the medical opinion of the panel Qualified Medical Examiner (PQME) to be substantial medical evidence, based on an adequate examination and supported by reasoning. This opinion was relied upon by the workers' compensation administrative law judge. Consequently, the applicant's petition was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

BARNARD VILLAR vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CDCR, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND (2017) – Van Nuys | CompFox