CompFox AI Summary
This case involves Barbara Clark's third petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation decision, which the Appeals Board is dismissing as an unauthorized successive petition. Clark's claims, including those related to temporary disability, medical treatment reimbursement, and penalties, were initially denied. Her subsequent petitions, including this one, have focused on allegations of fraud concerning the defendant's counsel's professional status, which the Board found did not address the merits of the prior determinations. The Board advises Clark that her proper recourse for contesting the original Findings and Award is a petition for writ of review in the Court of Appeal.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves Barbara Clark's third petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation decision, which the Appeals Board is dismissing as an unauthorized successive petition. Clark's claims, including those related to temporary disability, medical treatment reimbursement, and penalties, were initially denied. Her subsequent petitions, including this one, have focused on allegations of fraud concerning the defendant's counsel's professional status, which the Board found did not address the merits of the prior determinations. The Board advises Clark that her proper recourse for contesting the original Findings and Award is a petition for writ of review in the Court of Appeal.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.