Home/Case Law/Bagels v. Laskowitz
Regular Panel Decision DecisionMotion to Remand Decision

Bagels v. Laskowitz

District Court, S.D. New York
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

A plaintiff, a bagel bakery co-partnership, initially filed an action against defendant unions, Local 338 and Local 802, in the New York Supreme Court, Bronx County. The defendant unions subsequently removed the case to a federal District Court, asserting federal jurisdiction based on alleged violations of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) under Section 8(b)(4)(B), (C), and (D), thereby falling within Section 303 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (LMRA). The plaintiff responded by filing a motion to remand the case back to the state court. Judge Frankel of the District Court, after reviewing the complaint, concluded that the allegations did not constitute secondary boycott activities or jurisdictional disputes as defined by the NLRA. Consequently, the court determined that federal jurisdiction was doubtful, and the plaintiff's motion to remand was granted, returning the case to the New York Supreme Court, Bronx County.

Bagels v. Laskowitz is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, S.D. New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, S.D. New York.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

A plaintiff, a bagel bakery co-partnership, initially filed an action against defendant unions, Local 338 and Local 802, in the New York Supreme Court, Bronx County. The defendant unions subsequently removed the case to a federal District Court, asserting federal jurisdiction based on alleged violations of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) under Section 8(b)(4)(B), (C), and (D), thereby falling within Section 303 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (LMRA). The plaintiff responded by filing a motion to remand the case back to the state court. Judge Frankel of the District Court, after reviewing the complaint, concluded that the allegations did not constitute secondary boycott activities or jurisdictional disputes as defined by the NLRA. Consequently, the court determined that federal jurisdiction was doubtful, and the plaintiff's motion to remand was granted, returning the case to the New York Supreme Court, Bronx County.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Bagels v. Laskowitz workers compensation case in District Court, S.D. New York. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Bagels v. Laskowitz case law summary from District Court, S.D. New York. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Bagels v. Laskowitz Case Analysis

Bagels v. Laskowitz is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, S.D. New York. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.