Home/Case Law/AURELIO MERCADO vs. TARGET STORES, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

AURELIO MERCADO vs. TARGET STORES, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Mar 19, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ237780

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a dispute over a permanent disability rating for an injured worker, Aurelio Mercado. The WCJ initially found the applicant's vocational expert's opinion admissible, leading to a finding of total disability, and rejected the employer's apportionment argument. However, the Appeals Board rescinded this decision, citing recent en banc rulings in Almaraz and Ogilvie which clarified the standards for rebutting permanent disability ratings. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision consistent with these updated legal precedents regarding diminished future earning capacity and apportionment.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a dispute over a permanent disability rating for an injured worker, Aurelio Mercado. The WCJ initially found the applicant's vocational expert's opinion admissible, leading to a finding of total disability, and rejected the employer's apportionment argument. However, the Appeals Board rescinded this decision, citing recent en banc rulings in Almaraz and Ogilvie which clarified the standards for rebutting permanent disability ratings. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision consistent with these updated legal precedents regarding diminished future earning capacity and apportionment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

AURELIO MERCADO vs. TARGET STORES, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2009) – San Francisco | CompFox