Home/Case Law/AURELIA SANCHEZ vs. PARACELSUS HEALTH CORP.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

AURELIA SANCHEZ vs. PARACELSUS HEALTH CORP.

Filed: Aug 17, 2007
San Francisco
VNO 452114, VNO 452108

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's decision, finding that the Agreed Medical Examiner's (AME) opinion regarding the applicant's neck injury was not substantial evidence. This was due to the AME's failure to review relevant medical records and consider the applicant's subsequent neck surgery. The case is returned to the trial level for further development of the record, including potentially obtaining a supplemental opinion from the AME or appointing a new medical examiner.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's decision, finding that the Agreed Medical Examiner's (AME) opinion regarding the applicant's neck injury was not substantial evidence. This was due to the AME's failure to review relevant medical records and consider the applicant's subsequent neck surgery. The case is returned to the trial level for further development of the record, including potentially obtaining a supplemental opinion from the AME or appointing a new medical examiner.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

AURELIA SANCHEZ vs. PARACELSUS HEALTH CORP. (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox