Home/Case Law/AUGUSTO DE ANDRADE vs. ITW CIP STAMPING, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, c/o BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

AUGUSTO DE ANDRADE vs. ITW CIP STAMPING, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, c/o BROADSPIRE

Filed: Apr 05, 2013
San Francisco
ADJ358838 (LBO 0360956) ADJ6781131

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an applicant's claim for injury to his internal systems and psyche. The WCJ's report, adopted by the Board, found that medical opinions from Dr. Jonathan C. Green and Dr. James E. O'Brien were compelling. These opinions concluded that the applicant's internal problems pre-existed the injury and were not industrial, and that no industrial psychiatric injury occurred. The WCJ's credibility findings, based on applicant's inconsistent testimony and a malingering test, were given great weight.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an applicant's claim for injury to his internal systems and psyche. The WCJ's report, adopted by the Board, found that medical opinions from Dr. Jonathan C. Green and Dr. James E. O'Brien were compelling. These opinions concluded that the applicant's internal problems pre-existed the injury and were not industrial, and that no industrial psychiatric injury occurred. The WCJ's credibility findings, based on applicant's inconsistent testimony and a malingering test, were given great weight.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

AUGUSTO DE ANDRADE vs. ITW CIP STAMPING, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, c/o BROADSPIRE (2013) – San Francisco | CompFox