CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Removal, rescinding a prior order that took the case off calendar. The Board found that the applicant had not shown due diligence in obtaining a psychiatric QME before the mandatory settlement conference and subsequent trial dates. The case was returned to the trial level for a status conference to address the applicant's condition and the defendant's contentions. This action was taken despite the applicant's change in legal representation.
ARTURO VERA vs. DIRKSEN TRANSPORTATION, NATIONAL INTERSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Bernardino. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Bernardino.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Removal, rescinding a prior order that took the case off calendar. The Board found that the applicant had not shown due diligence in obtaining a psychiatric QME before the mandatory settlement conference and subsequent trial dates. The case was returned to the trial level for a status conference to address the applicant's condition and the defendant's contentions. This action was taken despite the applicant's change in legal representation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.