Home/Case Law/ARTURO BERNAL vs. RIVIERA RESORT AND SPA, BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ARTURO BERNAL vs. RIVIERA RESORT AND SPA, BROADSPIRE

Filed: Aug 09, 2017
Santa Ana
ADJ7597718 ADJ7597723

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration. Although the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) initially stated the petition was untimely, the Board found it was timely filed. This was because the defendant had not been properly served with the original or amended Findings, Award and Order. The Board adopted the WCJ's report and reasoning in its denial.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration. Although the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) initially stated the petition was untimely, the Board found it was timely filed. This was because the defendant had not been properly served with the original or amended Findings, Award and Order. The Board adopted the WCJ's report and reasoning in its denial.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ARTURO BERNAL vs. RIVIERA RESORT AND SPA, BROADSPIRE (2017) – Santa Ana | CompFox