CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a dispute over contribution liability between two insurance carriers for an applicant's cumulative trauma injury. The original Findings and Award determined Everest National Insurance was 68% liable and SCIF 32% liable, ordering Everest to pay SCIF $31,513.97. Everest's petition for reconsideration focuses solely on the monetary calculation, not the proportional liability. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to rescind the original award, as the WCA's attempt to rescind it was untimely. The matter is returned to the WCA for further proceedings and a proper decision on the monetary calculations.
ARTURO AVILA vs. CARIMEX INTERNATIONAL TRADING, EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a dispute over contribution liability between two insurance carriers for an applicant's cumulative trauma injury. The original Findings and Award determined Everest National Insurance was 68% liable and SCIF 32% liable, ordering Everest to pay SCIF $31,513.97. Everest's petition for reconsideration focuses solely on the monetary calculation, not the proportional liability. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to rescind the original award, as the WCA's attempt to rescind it was untimely. The matter is returned to the WCA for further proceedings and a proper decision on the monetary calculations.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.