CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration because it sought review of a non-final, interlocutory procedural order, not a decision determining substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would justify this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's report, incorporated by the Board, detailed why the order was not final and why removal was unwarranted. Therefore, the Board affirmed the WCJ's decision by dismissing the reconsideration and denying the removal.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration because it sought review of a non-final, interlocutory procedural order, not a decision determining substantive rights or liabilities. The Board also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm that would justify this extraordinary remedy. The WCJ's report, incorporated by the Board, detailed why the order was not final and why removal was unwarranted. Therefore, the Board affirmed the WCJ's decision by dismissing the reconsideration and denying the removal.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.