Home/Case Law/ARMANDO BALDERAS vs. GTE CORPORATION, CHARTIS INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ARMANDO BALDERAS vs. GTE CORPORATION, CHARTIS INSURANCE

Filed: Jul 01, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ2405891

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a workers' compensation applicant found 100% permanently disabled with no apportionment of the disability. The defendant sought reconsideration, arguing prior injuries should be apportioned, but failed to provide adequate evidence. The Board denied reconsideration, finding the defendant's burden to prove apportionment was not met. The Board also corrected a clerical error regarding the case number on the original award.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a workers' compensation applicant found 100% permanently disabled with no apportionment of the disability. The defendant sought reconsideration, arguing prior injuries should be apportioned, but failed to provide adequate evidence. The Board denied reconsideration, finding the defendant's burden to prove apportionment was not met. The Board also corrected a clerical error regarding the case number on the original award.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ARMANDO BALDERAS vs. GTE CORPORATION, CHARTIS INSURANCE (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox