Home/Case Law/ARCELIA TORRES vs. RALPHS, SEDGWICK CMS
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

ARCELIA TORRES vs. RALPHS, SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Mar 25, 2014
Goleta
ADJ7834761

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied a petition for removal. The applicant sought removal due to a change in hearing location from Santa Barbara to Oxnard, citing inconvenience. The WCAB found this to be a mere inconvenience, not significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board affirmed its authority to calendar hearings at different district offices when judicial or space resources are limited, as per statutory provisions and its inherent judicial powers. The current arrangement, including the use of CourtCall, is a temporary measure while a more suitable Santa Barbara location is sought.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied a petition for removal. The applicant sought removal due to a change in hearing location from Santa Barbara to Oxnard, citing inconvenience. The WCAB found this to be a mere inconvenience, not significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board affirmed its authority to calendar hearings at different district offices when judicial or space resources are limited, as per statutory provisions and its inherent judicial powers. The current arrangement, including the use of CourtCall, is a temporary measure while a more suitable Santa Barbara location is sought.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ARCELIA TORRES vs. RALPHS, SEDGWICK CMS (2014) – Goleta | CompFox