Home/Case Law/ARACELY MARTINEZ vs. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; SCIF INSURED, INLAND EMPIRE, SCIF STATE EMPLOYEES
Regular Decision

ARACELY MARTINEZ vs. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; SCIF INSURED, INLAND EMPIRE, SCIF STATE EMPLOYEES

Filed: Oct 13, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ3748181 (SBR 0311583), ADJ3809298 (SBR 0325610)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Aracely Martinez's petition for reconsideration, adopting the findings of the workers' compensation administrative law judge. The Board clarified that while the judge could consider a regular physician for an independent medical examination under Labor Code section 5701, no authority existed for a formal Independent Medical Examiner (IME). Consequently, the defendant's petition for reconsideration was denied.

ARACELY MARTINEZ vs. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; SCIF INSURED, INLAND EMPIRE, SCIF STATE EMPLOYEES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Aracely Martinez's petition for reconsideration, adopting the findings of the workers' compensation administrative law judge. The Board clarified that while the judge could consider a "regular physician" for an independent medical examination under Labor Code section 5701, no authority existed for a formal Independent Medical Examiner (IME). Consequently, the defendant's petition for reconsideration was denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ARACELY MARTINEZ vs. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; SCIF INSURED, INLAND EMPIRE, SCIF STATE EMPLOYEES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ARACELY MARTINEZ vs. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; SCIF INSURED, INLAND EMPIRE, SCIF STATE EMPLOYEES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ARACELY MARTINEZ vs. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; SCIF INSURED, INLAND EMPIRE, SCIF STATE EMPLOYEES Case Analysis

ARACELY MARTINEZ vs. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; SCIF INSURED, INLAND EMPIRE, SCIF STATE EMPLOYEES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.