Home/Case Law/, Applicant, vs. 99 CENT ONLY STORES, INC.; SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, vs. , Defendant(s).
Regular DecisionReconsideration

, Applicant, vs. 99 CENT ONLY STORES, INC.; SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, vs. , Defendant(s).

Filed: Feb 22, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ7231344 ADJ7231347 ADJ7231403

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration as untimely, as it was filed over 25 days after the Administrative Law Judge's decision. The Board emphasized that the 20-day filing deadline, extended by five days for mailing, is jurisdictional. Furthermore, the petition was not taken from a final order, and the request for removal was denied for failure to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration as untimely, as it was filed over 25 days after the Administrative Law Judge's decision. The Board emphasized that the 20-day filing deadline, extended by five days for mailing, is jurisdictional. Furthermore, the petition was not taken from a final order, and the request for removal was denied for failure to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

, Applicant, vs. 99 CENT ONLY STORES, INC.; SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, vs. , Defendant(s). (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox