CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the applicant's petition, rescinding the original Findings and Award. The applicant's petition raised several arguments, including errors in the permanent disability rate, failure to rate a sleep disorder and visual impairment, unsupported apportionment of psychiatric disability, and incorrect attorney fees. The defendant admitted a clerical error in the permanent disability rate. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to address these issues.
, Applicant, Silvestre Acevedo vs. , Defendants. PAHRUMP HEIFER RANCH; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in Stockton. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Stockton.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the applicant's petition, rescinding the original Findings and Award. The applicant's petition raised several arguments, including errors in the permanent disability rate, failure to rate a sleep disorder and visual impairment, unsupported apportionment of psychiatric disability, and incorrect attorney fees. The defendant admitted a clerical error in the permanent disability rate. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to address these issues.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.