Home/Case Law/, Applicant, HAROLD ELLIS, vs. , Defendants. INTERNATIONAL BASKETBALL LEAGUE; USF&G; DENVER NUGGETS; LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS; TIG INSURANCE COMPANY,
Regular DecisionReconsideration

, Applicant, HAROLD ELLIS, vs. , Defendants. INTERNATIONAL BASKETBALL LEAGUE; USF&G; DENVER NUGGETS; LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS; TIG INSURANCE COMPANY,

Filed: Jul 22, 2013
ADJ2221933 (ANA 0371957)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves an appeal by the International Basketball League (IBL) challenging a prior award of permanent disability benefits to a professional basketball player under California workers' compensation law. The IBL argues it should be exempt under Labor Code section 3600.5(b), which applies when an employee is hired outside California and temporarily works within the state. The Appeals Board rescinded the prior award, remanding the case for a new decision. The WCJ must now determine if the IBL meets the four-part test for exemption as outlined in the Carroll v. Cincinnati Bengals en banc decision.

, Applicant, HAROLD ELLIS, vs. , Defendants. INTERNATIONAL BASKETBALL LEAGUE; USF&G; DENVER NUGGETS; LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS; TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves an appeal by the International Basketball League (IBL) challenging a prior award of permanent disability benefits to a professional basketball player under California workers' compensation law. The IBL argues it should be exempt under Labor Code section 3600.5(b), which applies when an employee is hired outside California and temporarily works within the state. The Appeals Board rescinded the prior award, remanding the case for a new decision. The WCJ must now determine if the IBL meets the four-part test for exemption as outlined in the Carroll v. Cincinnati Bengals en banc decision.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

, Applicant, HAROLD ELLIS, vs. , Defendants. INTERNATIONAL BASKETBALL LEAGUE; USF&G; DENVER NUGGETS; LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS; TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

, Applicant, HAROLD ELLIS, vs. , Defendants. INTERNATIONAL BASKETBALL LEAGUE; USF&G; DENVER NUGGETS; LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS; TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

, Applicant, HAROLD ELLIS, vs. , Defendants. INTERNATIONAL BASKETBALL LEAGUE; USF&G; DENVER NUGGETS; LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS; TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Case Analysis

, Applicant, HAROLD ELLIS, vs. , Defendants. INTERNATIONAL BASKETBALL LEAGUE; USF&G; DENVER NUGGETS; LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS; TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.