Home/Case Law/, Applicant, ALYCE WENTZ vs. , Defendant(s). ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED adjusted by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

, Applicant, ALYCE WENTZ vs. , Defendant(s). ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED adjusted by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Jul 02, 2008
San Francisco
LBO 0374533

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a dispute over the calculation of permanent disability indemnity in a workers' compensation claim. The employer sought reconsideration of an award that incorrectly calculated the total indemnity based on the maximum rate instead of the applicant's specific rate. The Appeals Board granted the employer's petition, correcting the total indemnity amount to $89,575.64 while affirming the permanent disability rating and life pension.

, Applicant, ALYCE WENTZ vs. , Defendant(s). ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED adjusted by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a dispute over the calculation of permanent disability indemnity in a workers' compensation claim. The employer sought reconsideration of an award that incorrectly calculated the total indemnity based on the maximum rate instead of the applicant's specific rate. The Appeals Board granted the employer's petition, correcting the total indemnity amount to $89,575.64 while affirming the permanent disability rating and life pension.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

, Applicant, ALYCE WENTZ vs. , Defendant(s). ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED adjusted by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

, Applicant, ALYCE WENTZ vs. , Defendant(s). ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED adjusted by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

, Applicant, ALYCE WENTZ vs. , Defendant(s). ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED adjusted by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES Case Analysis

, Applicant, ALYCE WENTZ vs. , Defendant(s). ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER; PERMISSIBLY SELF-INSURED adjusted by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.