Home/Case Law/ANTONIO ZAMORA vs. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE
Regular DecisionOpinion and Order Denying Petition for Reconsideration

ANTONIO ZAMORA vs. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE

Filed: Sep 05, 2025
Van Nuys
ADJ10528292; ADJ12975722

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied defendant AT&T Communications' petition for reconsideration regarding a Joint Findings and Award (F&A). The F&A found that applicant Antonio Zamora sustained new and further disability from a cumulative injury (right hip, hypertension, diabetes) and a separate new injury (right shoulder). Defendant challenged the WCJ's reliance on Dr. David Heskiaoff's orthopedic impairment findings and argued that increased impairment for hypertension and diabetes should be attributed to the new injury based on Dr. Stewart Lonky's reports. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding Dr. Heskiaoff's reports constituted substantial medical evidence and that Dr. Lonky's opinions on apportionment lacked the necessary specificity and reasoning.

ANTONIO ZAMORA vs. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in Van Nuys. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Van Nuys.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied defendant AT&T Communications' petition for reconsideration regarding a Joint Findings and Award (F&A). The F&A found that applicant Antonio Zamora sustained new and further disability from a cumulative injury (right hip, hypertension, diabetes) and a separate new injury (right shoulder). Defendant challenged the WCJ's reliance on Dr. David Heskiaoff's orthopedic impairment findings and argued that increased impairment for hypertension and diabetes should be attributed to the new injury based on Dr. Stewart Lonky's reports. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding Dr. Heskiaoff's reports constituted substantial medical evidence and that Dr. Lonky's opinions on apportionment lacked the necessary specificity and reasoning.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ANTONIO ZAMORA vs. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE workers compensation case in Van Nuys. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ANTONIO ZAMORA vs. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE case law summary from Van Nuys. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ANTONIO ZAMORA vs. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE Case Analysis

ANTONIO ZAMORA vs. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Van Nuys. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.