Home/Case Law/ANTONIO PIERCE vs. WASHINGTON REDSKINS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE AND TRAVELERS, NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC., GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration Decision

ANTONIO PIERCE vs. WASHINGTON REDSKINS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE AND TRAVELERS, NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC., GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: May 23, 2017
Anaheim
ADJ 8937991

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns whether the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has jurisdiction over a professional football player's cumulative injury claim. The applicant asserts he was hired in California by the Washington Redskins and New York Football Giants, Inc., triggering WCAB jurisdiction. Defendants argued against jurisdiction, citing limited California contacts and employment contracts specifying other state laws. The WCAB affirmed the judge's finding of jurisdiction, holding that the applicant's hiring in California is sufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction under Labor Code sections 3600.5 and 5305, irrespective of other contacts.

ANTONIO PIERCE vs. WASHINGTON REDSKINS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE AND TRAVELERS, NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC., GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns whether the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has jurisdiction over a professional football player's cumulative injury claim. The applicant asserts he was hired in California by the Washington Redskins and New York Football Giants, Inc., triggering WCAB jurisdiction. Defendants argued against jurisdiction, citing limited California contacts and employment contracts specifying other state laws. The WCAB affirmed the judge's finding of jurisdiction, holding that the applicant's hiring in California is sufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction under Labor Code sections 3600.5 and 5305, irrespective of other contacts.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ANTONIO PIERCE vs. WASHINGTON REDSKINS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE AND TRAVELERS, NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC., GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in Anaheim. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ANTONIO PIERCE vs. WASHINGTON REDSKINS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE AND TRAVELERS, NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC., GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from Anaheim. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ANTONIO PIERCE vs. WASHINGTON REDSKINS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE AND TRAVELERS, NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC., GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

ANTONIO PIERCE vs. WASHINGTON REDSKINS, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE AND TRAVELERS, NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANTS, INC., GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Anaheim. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.