CompFox AI Summary
In Barajas v. Los Angeles Unified School District, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Removal. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning, finding that the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was denied. Furthermore, the Board determined that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if an adverse decision ultimately issued. Therefore, removal was deemed an inappropriate and extraordinary remedy in this instance.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In Barajas v. Los Angeles Unified School District, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Removal. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning, finding that the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm if removal was denied. Furthermore, the Board determined that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if an adverse decision ultimately issued. Therefore, removal was deemed an inappropriate and extraordinary remedy in this instance.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.