Home/Case Law/ ## ANTHONY MEYN, vs. ## LACMTA; Permissibly Self-Insured, As Administered By LACMA; TRAVELERS INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

## ANTHONY MEYN, vs. ## LACMTA; Permissibly Self-Insured, As Administered By LACMA; TRAVELERS INSURANCE

Filed: Feb 25, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ461872 (MON 0305024)

CompFox AI Summary

In this workers' compensation case, the Board denied Travelers Insurance's petition for reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that the applicant sustained a cumulative trauma injury as a bus driver ending June 8, 2002. Travelers argued the date of injury should have been July 16, 1998, when the applicant was diagnosed with hypertension, asserting the applicant knew his condition was work-related at that time. However, the Board found insufficient evidence that the applicant knew or should have known in 1998 that his disability was caused by his employment. Therefore, liability was correctly apportioned to the employer for the period ending June 8, 2002, when the applicant's injurious exposure concluded.

ANTHONY MEYN, vs. ## LACMTA; Permissibly Self-Insured, As Administered By LACMA; TRAVELERS INSURANCE is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco.

This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In this workers' compensation case, the Board denied Travelers Insurance's petition for reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that the applicant sustained a cumulative trauma injury as a bus driver ending June 8, 2002. Travelers argued the date of injury should have been July 16, 1998, when the applicant was diagnosed with hypertension, asserting the applicant knew his condition was work-related at that time. However, the Board found insufficient evidence that the applicant knew or should have known in 1998 that his disability was caused by his employment. Therefore, liability was correctly apportioned to the employer for the period ending June 8, 2002, when the applicant's injurious exposure concluded.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

## ANTHONY MEYN, vs. ## LACMTA; Permissibly Self-Insured, As Administered By LACMA; TRAVELERS INSURANCE workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

## ANTHONY MEYN, vs. ## LACMTA; Permissibly Self-Insured, As Administered By LACMA; TRAVELERS INSURANCE case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

## ANTHONY MEYN, vs. ## LACMTA; Permissibly Self-Insured, As Administered By LACMA; TRAVELERS INSURANCE Case Analysis

## ANTHONY MEYN, vs. ## LACMTA; Permissibly Self-Insured, As Administered By LACMA; TRAVELERS INSURANCE is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.