CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Annette Madrigal's Petition for Removal, affirming a prior decision. The Board held that Verizon can require Madrigal to obtain medical treatment for her bilateral wrist injury from a physician within their Medical Provider Network (MPN). This is because Madrigal self-procured treatment when her claim was initially denied, and there has been no final determination awarding her the right to select her physician under Labor Code section 4600. The Board found no extraordinary circumstances to justify removal.
ANNETTE MADRIGAL vs. VERIZON, AMERICAN HOME INSURANCE, administered by SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Ana. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Ana.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Annette Madrigal's Petition for Removal, affirming a prior decision. The Board held that Verizon can require Madrigal to obtain medical treatment for her bilateral wrist injury from a physician within their Medical Provider Network (MPN). This is because Madrigal self-procured treatment when her claim was initially denied, and there has been no final determination awarding her the right to select her physician under Labor Code section 4600. The Board found no extraordinary circumstances to justify removal.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.