Home/Case Law/Ann Swengel vs. CAMBRIDGE; AON CORPORATION, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Ann Swengel vs. CAMBRIDGE; AON CORPORATION, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA

Filed: Jan 19, 2017
ADJ4261717 (FRE 0227914), ADJ2564944 (FRE 0224116)

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration, reversing the prior order that mandated a gym membership. The Board found that because the defendant timely submitted the request for authorization (RFA) to Utilization Review (UR), the UR's denial is not subject to review by the Board, nor is it subject to Independent Medical Review (IMR) if not timely appealed. Consequently, the applicant's petition for reconsideration and for penalties was denied. The Board emphasized that their jurisdiction regarding UR determinations is limited to timeliness.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration, reversing the prior order that mandated a gym membership. The Board found that because the defendant timely submitted the request for authorization (RFA) to Utilization Review (UR), the UR's denial is not subject to review by the Board, nor is it subject to Independent Medical Review (IMR) if not timely appealed. Consequently, the applicant's petition for reconsideration and for penalties was denied. The Board emphasized that their jurisdiction regarding UR determinations is limited to timeliness.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Ann Swengel vs. CAMBRIDGE; AON CORPORATION, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA (2017) – | CompFox