Home/Case Law/ANITA FOLEY vs. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

ANITA FOLEY vs. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Oct 14, 2020
Riverside
ADJ12047325

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board found the WCJ's analysis sufficiently addressed the defendant's arguments and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board noted a supplemental report from a qualified medical examiner is pending, and the trial judge can address any necessary continuances or further development of the record.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal. Removal is an extraordinary remedy granted only upon a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board found the WCJ's analysis sufficiently addressed the defendant's arguments and that reconsideration would be an adequate remedy. The Board noted a supplemental report from a qualified medical examiner is pending, and the trial judge can address any necessary continuances or further development of the record.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ANITA FOLEY vs. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2020) – Riverside | CompFox