CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the original award due to insufficient evidence. Applicant did not meet the six-month employment requirement for a compensable psychological injury under Labor Code section 3208.3(d). Furthermore, the Board found insufficient evidence of concurrent self-employment earnings to support the awarded average weekly wage. The case is returned to the trial level for a new decision reflecting these findings.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the original award due to insufficient evidence. Applicant did not meet the six-month employment requirement for a compensable psychological injury under Labor Code section 3208.3(d). Furthermore, the Board found insufficient evidence of concurrent self-employment earnings to support the awarded average weekly wage. The case is returned to the trial level for a new decision reflecting these findings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.