CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the original award due to insufficient evidence. Applicant did not meet the six-month employment requirement for a compensable psychological injury under Labor Code section 3208.3(d). Furthermore, the Board found insufficient evidence of concurrent self-employment earnings to support the awarded average weekly wage. The case is returned to the trial level for a new decision reflecting these findings.
ANITA ELLIS vs. ATC/VANCOM, CALIFORNIA INSUARNCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, For CALCOMP, In Liquidation is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the original award due to insufficient evidence. Applicant did not meet the six-month employment requirement for a compensable psychological injury under Labor Code section 3208.3(d). Furthermore, the Board found insufficient evidence of concurrent self-employment earnings to support the awarded average weekly wage. The case is returned to the trial level for a new decision reflecting these findings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.