Home/Case Law/ANGELICA RAMIREZ DE ZARATE vs. RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE AND WELLNESS CENTRE, LLC; XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

ANGELICA RAMIREZ DE ZARATE vs. RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE AND WELLNESS CENTRE, LLC; XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Jul 25, 2025
Riverside
ADJ18434613

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board considered a Petition for Reconsideration filed by the Defendants, Riverside Healthcare and Wellness Centre, LLC, and XL Specialty Insurance Company. The petition challenged the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) findings regarding an injury sustained by the applicant, Angelica Ramirez de Zarate, to her left knee and the applicability of Labor Code Section 5400. The Appeals Board, adopting the WCJ's report and reasoning, found that the applicant credibly testified about her injury and that the defendants failed to prove prejudice due to late reporting under Labor Code Section 5403. Consequently, the Board denied the petition for reconsideration.

ANGELICA RAMIREZ DE ZARATE vs. RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE AND WELLNESS CENTRE, LLC; XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Riverside. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Riverside.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board considered a Petition for Reconsideration filed by the Defendants, Riverside Healthcare and Wellness Centre, LLC, and XL Specialty Insurance Company. The petition challenged the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) findings regarding an injury sustained by the applicant, Angelica Ramirez de Zarate, to her left knee and the applicability of Labor Code Section 5400. The Appeals Board, adopting the WCJ's report and reasoning, found that the applicant credibly testified about her injury and that the defendants failed to prove prejudice due to late reporting under Labor Code Section 5403. Consequently, the Board denied the petition for reconsideration.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ANGELICA RAMIREZ DE ZARATE vs. RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE AND WELLNESS CENTRE, LLC; XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY workers compensation case in Riverside. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ANGELICA RAMIREZ DE ZARATE vs. RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE AND WELLNESS CENTRE, LLC; XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY case law summary from Riverside. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ANGELICA RAMIREZ DE ZARATE vs. RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE AND WELLNESS CENTRE, LLC; XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY Case Analysis

ANGELICA RAMIREZ DE ZARATE vs. RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE AND WELLNESS CENTRE, LLC; XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Riverside. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.