CompFox AI Summary
This case involves Angela Gjertsen's petition for removal, which the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied. The petition, filed by Gjertsen's attorneys, sought reconsideration of an order taking a lien conference off calendar and requiring a supplemental AME report. The WCJ recommended denial because the petition lacked verification and proof of service, and the applicant failed to demonstrate she was aggrieved or irreparably harmed by the order. The WCJ noted that the order directed the defendant and lien claimant, not the applicant, to obtain the supplemental report.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves Angela Gjertsen's petition for removal, which the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied. The petition, filed by Gjertsen's attorneys, sought reconsideration of an order taking a lien conference off calendar and requiring a supplemental AME report. The WCJ recommended denial because the petition lacked verification and proof of service, and the applicant failed to demonstrate she was aggrieved or irreparably harmed by the order. The WCJ noted that the order directed the defendant and lien claimant, not the applicant, to obtain the supplemental report.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.