CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a lien claimant, Sidhu Chiropractic, whose lien was disallowed by an Order dated November 19, 2007. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review proof of service of this Order after the lien claimant contended it was not served. The Board found the lien claimant had actual notice of the disallowance by early December 2007. Because the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration was filed on April 8, 2009, over 15 months later, it was untimely and therefore dismissed as the time limit is jurisdictional.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a lien claimant, Sidhu Chiropractic, whose lien was disallowed by an Order dated November 19, 2007. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review proof of service of this Order after the lien claimant contended it was not served. The Board found the lien claimant had actual notice of the disallowance by early December 2007. Because the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration was filed on April 8, 2009, over 15 months later, it was untimely and therefore dismissed as the time limit is jurisdictional.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.