Home/Case Law/ANGANYE CHOY vs. FRIENDLY FRANCHISEES CORPORATION DBA CARL'S JR, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, administered by CRUM AND FORSTER
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ANGANYE CHOY vs. FRIENDLY FRANCHISEES CORPORATION DBA CARL'S JR, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, administered by CRUM AND FORSTER

Filed: May 02, 2017
Van Nuys
ADJ9422751

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report, finding the panel qualified medical examiner's opinion to be substantial evidence based on adequate examination and reasoning. The Board affirmed that one physician's relevant opinion can constitute substantial evidence, even if contradicted. Furthermore, no good cause was established for further discovery after the mandatory settlement conference.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. The WCAB adopted the WCJ's report, finding the panel qualified medical examiner's opinion to be substantial evidence based on adequate examination and reasoning. The Board affirmed that one physician's relevant opinion can constitute substantial evidence, even if contradicted. Furthermore, no good cause was established for further discovery after the mandatory settlement conference.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ANGANYE CHOY vs. FRIENDLY FRANCHISEES CORPORATION DBA CARL'S JR, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, administered by CRUM AND FORSTER (2017) – Van Nuys | CompFox