Home/Case Law/ANDREW HERNANDEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

ANDREW HERNANDEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Apr 19, 2013
San Francisco
ADJ1646469 (VNO 0550706)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns the defendant's petition for reconsideration of an award for industrial injury to the applicant's low back and cervical spine. The defendant argued the applicant was not temporarily disabled as they offered a modified position consistent with AME Dr. Sew Hoy's restrictions, and that sub rosa videos should have been admitted. The Board denied reconsideration, finding Dr. Sew Hoy's report was qualified and did not preclude temporary disability, especially when contrasted with the applicant's treating physician's consistent findings. The Board also upheld the exclusion of the sub rosa videos due to late disclosure, as required by Labor Code section 5502(d)(3).

ANDREW HERNANDEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns the defendant's petition for reconsideration of an award for industrial injury to the applicant's low back and cervical spine. The defendant argued the applicant was not temporarily disabled as they offered a modified position consistent with AME Dr. Sew Hoy's restrictions, and that sub rosa videos should have been admitted. The Board denied reconsideration, finding Dr. Sew Hoy's report was qualified and did not preclude temporary disability, especially when contrasted with the applicant's treating physician's consistent findings. The Board also upheld the exclusion of the sub rosa videos due to late disclosure, as required by Labor Code section 5502(d)(3).

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ANDREW HERNANDEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ANDREW HERNANDEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ANDREW HERNANDEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

ANDREW HERNANDEZ vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.