Home/Case Law/Andres Hernandez vs. Pearce Services, Inc.; Sparta Insurance Company
Regular DecisionDecision After Reconsideration

Andres Hernandez vs. Pearce Services, Inc.; Sparta Insurance Company

Filed: May 30, 2025
San Luis Obispo
ADJ9972218

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns Andres Hernandez's Petition for Reconsideration regarding a workers' compensation administrative law judge's finding that his Petition to Reopen was time-barred by Labor Code section 5410. The applicant sustained an industrial injury to his left knee in December 2013, leading to a stipulated Award in May 2015. Following left knee surgery in October 2018, he filed a Petition to Reopen in February 2019, claiming new and further disability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, concluding that the five-year statute of limitations was not tolled by the defendant's provision of benefits or notices, as the applicant did not prove receipt or reliance on any affirmative statement to delay filing before the limitation period expired. Thus, the claim for new and further permanent disability was barred.

Andres Hernandez vs. Pearce Services, Inc.; Sparta Insurance Company is a workers' compensation case decided in San Luis Obispo. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Luis Obispo.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns Andres Hernandez's Petition for Reconsideration regarding a workers' compensation administrative law judge's finding that his Petition to Reopen was time-barred by Labor Code section 5410. The applicant sustained an industrial injury to his left knee in December 2013, leading to a stipulated Award in May 2015. Following left knee surgery in October 2018, he filed a Petition to Reopen in February 2019, claiming new and further disability. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, concluding that the five-year statute of limitations was not tolled by the defendant's provision of benefits or notices, as the applicant did not prove receipt or reliance on any affirmative statement to delay filing before the limitation period expired. Thus, the claim for new and further permanent disability was barred.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Andres Hernandez vs. Pearce Services, Inc.; Sparta Insurance Company workers compensation case in San Luis Obispo. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Andres Hernandez vs. Pearce Services, Inc.; Sparta Insurance Company case law summary from San Luis Obispo. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Andres Hernandez vs. Pearce Services, Inc.; Sparta Insurance Company Case Analysis

Andres Hernandez vs. Pearce Services, Inc.; Sparta Insurance Company is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Luis Obispo. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.