Home/Case Law/ANDRE JONES vs. HUSTLER CASINO Permissibly Self-Insured, CORVEL CORPORATION as Third Party Administrator
Regular Decision

ANDRE JONES vs. HUSTLER CASINO Permissibly Self-Insured, CORVEL CORPORATION as Third Party Administrator

Filed: Oct 08, 2012
Pomona
ADJ7282822

CompFox AI Summary

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) order dismisses an applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order that determined substantive rights. The WCAB found the underlying decision to be an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary ruling, not a final determination. The Petition for Removal was also denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm warranting such action. Therefore, the WCAB dismissed the reconsideration petition and denied the removal request.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) order dismisses an applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order that determined substantive rights. The WCAB found the underlying decision to be an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary ruling, not a final determination. The Petition for Removal was also denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm warranting such action. Therefore, the WCAB dismissed the reconsideration petition and denied the removal request.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

ANDRE JONES vs. HUSTLER CASINO Permissibly Self-Insured, CORVEL CORPORATION as Third Party Administrator (2012) – Pomona | CompFox