Home/Case Law/ANDRE JONES vs. HUSTLER CASINO Permissibly Self-Insured, CORVEL CORPORATION as Third Party Administrator
Regular Decision

ANDRE JONES vs. HUSTLER CASINO Permissibly Self-Insured, CORVEL CORPORATION as Third Party Administrator

Filed: Oct 08, 2012
Pomona
ADJ7282822

CompFox AI Summary

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) order dismisses an applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a final order that determined substantive rights. The WCAB found the underlying decision to be an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary ruling, not a final determination. The Petition for Removal was also denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm warranting such action. Therefore, the WCAB dismissed the reconsideration petition and denied the removal request.

ANDRE JONES vs. HUSTLER CASINO Permissibly Self-Insured, CORVEL CORPORATION as Third Party Administrator is a workers' compensation case decided in Pomona. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Pomona.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) order dismisses an applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order that determined substantive rights. The WCAB found the underlying decision to be an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary ruling, not a final determination. The Petition for Removal was also denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm warranting such action. Therefore, the WCAB dismissed the reconsideration petition and denied the removal request.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ANDRE JONES vs. HUSTLER CASINO Permissibly Self-Insured, CORVEL CORPORATION as Third Party Administrator workers compensation case in Pomona. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ANDRE JONES vs. HUSTLER CASINO Permissibly Self-Insured, CORVEL CORPORATION as Third Party Administrator case law summary from Pomona. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ANDRE JONES vs. HUSTLER CASINO Permissibly Self-Insured, CORVEL CORPORATION as Third Party Administrator Case Analysis

ANDRE JONES vs. HUSTLER CASINO Permissibly Self-Insured, CORVEL CORPORATION as Third Party Administrator is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Pomona. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.