Home/Case Law/Anderson, Barry v. Aramark
Regular Panel Decision DecisionExpedited Hearing Order

Anderson, Barry v. Aramark

Filed: Apr 06, 2016
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
2015-08-0295

CompFox AI Summary

Barry Anderson, an employee of Aramark, sustained a right-knee injury on May 26, 2015, while performing strenuous duties in the 'mats cell.' Despite reporting the injury and requesting medical attention, Aramark denied his workers' compensation claim, asserting it was not work-related or was pre-existing. Mr. Anderson sought treatment from Dr. Lloyd Robinson and later orthopedic specialist Dr. Anthony Mascioli, who diagnosed a right-knee medial meniscus tear. In an expedited hearing, the Court found Mr. Anderson credible and his injury compensable, ordering Aramark to provide a panel of physicians for his medical treatment. However, the Court denied his request for past medical expenses and temporary disability benefits without prejudice, allowing for future consideration.

Anderson, Barry v. Aramark is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Barry Anderson, an employee of Aramark, sustained a right-knee injury on May 26, 2015, while performing strenuous duties in the 'mats cell.' Despite reporting the injury and requesting medical attention, Aramark denied his workers' compensation claim, asserting it was not work-related or was pre-existing. Mr. Anderson sought treatment from Dr. Lloyd Robinson and later orthopedic specialist Dr. Anthony Mascioli, who diagnosed a right-knee medial meniscus tear. In an expedited hearing, the Court found Mr. Anderson credible and his injury compensable, ordering Aramark to provide a panel of physicians for his medical treatment. However, the Court denied his request for past medical expenses and temporary disability benefits without prejudice, allowing for future consideration.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Anderson, Barry v. Aramark workers compensation case in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Anderson, Barry v. Aramark case law summary from Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Anderson, Barry v. Aramark Case Analysis

Anderson, Barry v. Aramark is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.