Home/Case Law/AMY CHRISTINE LENTINE vs. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

AMY CHRISTINE LENTINE vs. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Jul 21, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ6770647

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's decision regarding Amy Christine Lentine's claim. The Board affirmed the finding that the claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. However, the issue of whether Lentine sustained an industrial injury was deferred and remanded to the WCJ for further proceedings. This means the compensability of the injury itself still needs to be determined.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of the WCJ's decision regarding Amy Christine Lentine's claim. The Board affirmed the finding that the claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. However, the issue of whether Lentine sustained an industrial injury was deferred and remanded to the WCJ for further proceedings. This means the compensability of the injury itself still needs to be determined.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

AMY CHRISTINE LENTINE vs. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox