Home/Case Law/AMERICA HURLADO DE MACIEL vs. GRAPEMAN LABOR COMPANY, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

AMERICA HURLADO DE MACIEL vs. GRAPEMAN LABOR COMPANY, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Apr 26, 2013
Fresno
ADJ8112909

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of the applicant's petition. The Board adopted the administrative law judge's report and found that the employer's Medical Provider Network (MPN) was valid, and the employer retained medical control. The applicant's choice to seek treatment outside the MPN at a distant facility was deemed unreasonable. The Board also admonished the petitioner for attaching excess documents to their filing, warning of potential sanctions for future violations.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of the applicant's petition. The Board adopted the administrative law judge's report and found that the employer's Medical Provider Network (MPN) was valid, and the employer retained medical control. The applicant's choice to seek treatment outside the MPN at a distant facility was deemed unreasonable. The Board also admonished the petitioner for attaching excess documents to their filing, warning of potential sanctions for future violations.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.