Home/Case Law/AMADO URIAS vs. VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, ACWA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AGENCY
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

AMADO URIAS vs. VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, ACWA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AGENCY

Filed: Dec 08, 2015
ADJ2 186466 (LAO 0872140) ADJ1902141 (LAO 0877542)

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant, Amado Urias, sought reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision regarding claims for back, internal system, and psychological injuries. The Board agreed to amend the temporary disability end date to May 3, 2007, as stipulated by both parties. However, the Board rescinded findings on permanent disability and attorney fees, remanding the issue of apportionment of the applicant's hypertension impairment back to the trial level for further development of the record. The WCJ's reasoning on vocational expert opinions and psychiatric apportionment was adopted, but Dr. Stewart's apportionment of hypertensive impairment was rejected for failing to meet California's causation-based standard.

AMADO URIAS vs. VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, ACWA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AGENCY is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant, Amado Urias, sought reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision regarding claims for back, internal system, and psychological injuries. The Board agreed to amend the temporary disability end date to May 3, 2007, as stipulated by both parties. However, the Board rescinded findings on permanent disability and attorney fees, remanding the issue of apportionment of the applicant's hypertension impairment back to the trial level for further development of the record. The WCJ's reasoning on vocational expert opinions and psychiatric apportionment was adopted, but Dr. Stewart's apportionment of hypertensive impairment was rejected for failing to meet California's causation-based standard.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

AMADO URIAS vs. VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, ACWA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AGENCY workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

AMADO URIAS vs. VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, ACWA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AGENCY case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

AMADO URIAS vs. VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, ACWA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AGENCY Case Analysis

AMADO URIAS vs. VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, ACWA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AGENCY is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.