CompFox AI Summary
The Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration concerning a Labor Code section 132a discrimination claim. The decision was based on the grounds that it was an impermissible successive petition and that the underlying claim was preempted by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
Alonso Navarro vs. A&A Farming, Western Growers Insurance Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration concerning a Labor Code section 132a discrimination claim. The decision was based on the grounds that it was an impermissible successive petition and that the underlying claim was preempted by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.