CompFox AI Summary
Applicant Alma Pelayo sought reconsideration of a prior decision that found no violation of Labor Code section 132(a) and ordered her to take nothing further. Pelayo argued the judge erred in this finding and in failing to rule on the admissibility of her Exhibit 15. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration solely to admit Pelayo's Exhibit 15 and defendant's Exhibits A1, A2, and A3. The Board otherwise affirmed the original decision, meaning Pelayo still takes nothing further.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Applicant Alma Pelayo sought reconsideration of a prior decision that found no violation of Labor Code section 132(a) and ordered her to take nothing further. Pelayo argued the judge erred in this finding and in failing to rule on the admissibility of her Exhibit 15. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration solely to admit Pelayo's Exhibit 15 and defendant's Exhibits A1, A2, and A3. The Board otherwise affirmed the original decision, meaning Pelayo still takes nothing further.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.