CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a dispute over the date of injury for applicant Alma Diaz's bilateral upper extremity cumulative trauma. The Appeals Board granted Everest National Insurance Company's petition for reconsideration and denied CIGA's, amending the original award. The Board found that applicant sustained a cumulative trauma injury on April 1, 2000, based on her modified work duties and need for treatment, aligning with Rodarte. Consequently, CIGA's petition was denied, and the decision was amended to reflect the corrected injury date.
ALMA DIAZ vs. DE HART'S PRINTING SERVICE GROUP; CAMBRIDGE 15901 SACRAMENTO is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a dispute over the date of injury for applicant Alma Diaz's bilateral upper extremity cumulative trauma. The Appeals Board granted Everest National Insurance Company's petition for reconsideration and denied CIGA's, amending the original award. The Board found that applicant sustained a cumulative trauma injury on April 1, 2000, based on her modified work duties and need for treatment, aligning with Rodarte. Consequently, CIGA's petition was denied, and the decision was amended to reflect the corrected injury date.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.