Home/Case Law/ALICE RIVERA PASILLAS vs. DURHAM D M, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS
Regular DecisionOpinion and Decision After Reconsideration

ALICE RIVERA PASILLAS vs. DURHAM D M, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Mar 13, 2023
Santa Ana
ADJ9915005

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a worker's claim that she was denied medical care, thus allowing her to seek treatment outside her employer's network. The applicant's attorney argued that the employer failed to provide authorization for treatment with a network physician. However, the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) found that the employer had provided timely authorization, evidenced by a fax confirmation and proof of service, and that the applicant's claim of non-receipt was insufficient to rebut the presumption of delivery. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reviewed the petition for reconsideration, adopted the WCJ's reasoning, and affirmed the original findings. Therefore, the WCAB upheld the decision that the applicant did not prove a denial of care.

ALICE RIVERA PASILLAS vs. DURHAM D M, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS is a workers' compensation case decided in Santa Ana. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Santa Ana.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a worker's claim that she was denied medical care, thus allowing her to seek treatment outside her employer's network. The applicant's attorney argued that the employer failed to provide authorization for treatment with a network physician. However, the Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) found that the employer had provided timely authorization, evidenced by a fax confirmation and proof of service, and that the applicant's claim of non-receipt was insufficient to rebut the presumption of delivery. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reviewed the petition for reconsideration, adopted the WCJ's reasoning, and affirmed the original findings. Therefore, the WCAB upheld the decision that the applicant did not prove a denial of care.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

ALICE RIVERA PASILLAS vs. DURHAM D M, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS workers compensation case in Santa Ana. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

ALICE RIVERA PASILLAS vs. DURHAM D M, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS case law summary from Santa Ana. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

ALICE RIVERA PASILLAS vs. DURHAM D M, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS Case Analysis

ALICE RIVERA PASILLAS vs. DURHAM D M, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Santa Ana. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.