CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant claiming multiple cumulative injuries, but the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied his petitions for reconsideration. The Board adopted the Judge's report, which found the applicant's testimony lacked credibility due to inconsistencies with prior claims, settlements, and medical histories. Consequently, the applicant's claims for injuries beyond a left shoulder injury were not substantiated. The Board gave significant weight to the Judge's credibility findings in reaching its decision.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant claiming multiple cumulative injuries, but the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied his petitions for reconsideration. The Board adopted the Judge's report, which found the applicant's testimony lacked credibility due to inconsistencies with prior claims, settlements, and medical histories. Consequently, the applicant's claims for injuries beyond a left shoulder injury were not substantiated. The Board gave significant weight to the Judge's credibility findings in reaching its decision.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.